<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hardware vs Forced VP9 Quality in Stadia on Chrome</title>
    <link>https://community.stadia.com/t5/Stadia-on-Chrome/Hardware-vs-Forced-VP9-Quality/m-p/49631#M3115</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello - I'm curious whether I'd get an improvement in stream quality if I upgraded by GPU vs just forcing VP9 in Chrome itself.&amp;nbsp; My PC has an Intel i5-4670k and a Radeon R9 280.&amp;nbsp; I know through Chrome's settings that the R9 280 does not support hardware acceleration so I was able to see some improvement forcing VP9, just with significant tearing and an inability to process a 4K stream smoothly, despite a wired ethernet connection (I presume I'm bottlenecked on my 7 year old processor).&amp;nbsp; I also have a Surface 5 which does support hardware VP9 but has trouble pushing a 4K stream across WIFI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm more or less dealing with a strange tradeoff: a stable connection with inferior quality or slightly better quality with an inconsistent connection (in addition to controller issues on the Surface which are completely unrelated.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm hoping to solve my problem by upgrading my GPU.&amp;nbsp; My question is: would an upgraded GPU give me any improvement in VP9 stream quality vs the forced software VP9 at the same resolution?&amp;nbsp; I would assume dedicated hardware would be able to support the 4K stream which appears much better than the 1080p stream, even when squeezed back onto a 1080p monitor.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, sincere apologies if I'm using the terms incorrectly here.&amp;nbsp; This feels a bit like uncharted territory for me and it's a little disorienting to troubleshoot this.&amp;nbsp; It's been a while since I've shopped for a GPU and even a "sidegrade" to the R9 is kind of pricey so I'd like to make this purchase with more confidence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MisterSwinkles</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-05T14:17:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hardware vs Forced VP9 Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.stadia.com/t5/Stadia-on-Chrome/Hardware-vs-Forced-VP9-Quality/m-p/49631#M3115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello - I'm curious whether I'd get an improvement in stream quality if I upgraded by GPU vs just forcing VP9 in Chrome itself.&amp;nbsp; My PC has an Intel i5-4670k and a Radeon R9 280.&amp;nbsp; I know through Chrome's settings that the R9 280 does not support hardware acceleration so I was able to see some improvement forcing VP9, just with significant tearing and an inability to process a 4K stream smoothly, despite a wired ethernet connection (I presume I'm bottlenecked on my 7 year old processor).&amp;nbsp; I also have a Surface 5 which does support hardware VP9 but has trouble pushing a 4K stream across WIFI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm more or less dealing with a strange tradeoff: a stable connection with inferior quality or slightly better quality with an inconsistent connection (in addition to controller issues on the Surface which are completely unrelated.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm hoping to solve my problem by upgrading my GPU.&amp;nbsp; My question is: would an upgraded GPU give me any improvement in VP9 stream quality vs the forced software VP9 at the same resolution?&amp;nbsp; I would assume dedicated hardware would be able to support the 4K stream which appears much better than the 1080p stream, even when squeezed back onto a 1080p monitor.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, sincere apologies if I'm using the terms incorrectly here.&amp;nbsp; This feels a bit like uncharted territory for me and it's a little disorienting to troubleshoot this.&amp;nbsp; It's been a while since I've shopped for a GPU and even a "sidegrade" to the R9 is kind of pricey so I'd like to make this purchase with more confidence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.stadia.com/t5/Stadia-on-Chrome/Hardware-vs-Forced-VP9-Quality/m-p/49631#M3115</guid>
      <dc:creator>MisterSwinkles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T14:17:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hardware vs Forced VP9 Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.stadia.com/t5/Stadia-on-Chrome/Hardware-vs-Forced-VP9-Quality/m-p/49632#M3116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.stadia.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/32489"&gt;@MisterSwinkles&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In your case it is the case that the VP9 is not supported and you force it, then the encoding then runs on the CPU instead of the GPU&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have a new GPU, it doesn't matter if you force it or not, if the GPU is powerful enough it will calculate it automatically because the hardware acceleration is activated in Chrome&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With your Surface you can try to force Stadia + VP9 and the resolution 1440p instead of 4k via the browser plug-in, it should run stable enough even over WiFi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.stadia.com/t5/Stadia-on-Chrome/Hardware-vs-Forced-VP9-Quality/m-p/49632#M3116</guid>
      <dc:creator>defischerrockt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T14:41:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

