Well..... https://youtu.be/BeFnQrgtZ9k?t=192 They did mislead fairly badly if you watch that link for about 1 min. 10.7 Teraflops is still more powerful than the PS5 which has 10.28 Teraflops, cle...
See more...
Well..... https://youtu.be/BeFnQrgtZ9k?t=192 They did mislead fairly badly if you watch that link for about 1 min. 10.7 Teraflops is still more powerful than the PS5 which has 10.28 Teraflops, clearly this hasn't translated at all to actual performance as Stadia was tied and in some cases weaker in performance than the last gen consoles, especially when you take into account the reduced visual fidelity from viewing a stream instead of a direct native feed. Having said that, OP could have just checked youtube to see comparisons before buying into Stadia, it's been pretty well known that Stadia doesn't produce any advantages in graphical performance to date. Also in terms of value for money the subscription for Stadia is only going to be good value for money if they are upgrading their hardware infrastructure and producing improved graphical performance on a more regular basis than the consoles. Because for example if it's another 5 years till the next consoles release, that's $600 of Stadia Pro Subscription (with no physical disc games or console to resell after). And for that $600 you may be paying more to avoid data caps on broadband and also playing games at a much lower graphics preset, lower frame rates, lower base resolution. It's good if you can't afford the lump sum of a console. If Stadia doesn't announce some major improvements to compete with the next gen consoles soon, you may as well get a console at this point. The fact that Stadia hasn't announced anything to combat the console hype, I would suggest it's going to be at least another year before we see any improvements.