If you are going to have youtuber partners give game keys for a draw and create a draw system using google account.
putting free to play games on Stadia PRO , maybe having some more content for subscribers , and putting a limit on players and queues when played outside of Stadia PRO , in totally free to play as Destiny 2 and PUBG are today
These games have to be highly optimized, using technologies that save server resources such as:
FSR 2.0
variable rate shading
(maybe) Google Seurat
(maybe) upscaling using Tensor core (TPU) machine learning
and etc
Thank you @Henrique for you suggestions. I highly recommend that you copy/paste and submit it directly to the Stadia team by using the app directly. If you open Stadia on any device, then click on your avatar, you'll see the option to leave feedback in that pop up window. This will be the best shot at getting your suggestions to the correct team.
Have a great day!
It's a stupid suggestion. Many people use Stadia rather than GFN, Xbox Ultimate, and Amazon Luna because they don't need to subscribe to Stadia to play games, and they prefer to buy games. Buying games rather than subscription is what makes Stadia really different from other cloud gaming services. Stadia has already raised the price of some Stadia games for non-Pro members, and Stadia Pro has free member games, 4K graphics for some games and 5.1 surround sound. That's enough. Why does someone suggest to put limit for non-Pro members?
because playing free to play takes up space on the server!! and I think that if there are a lot of people playing in free to play, no server will support many players!!! It's good to have free to play games for testing and to increase the number of people playing a specific game! but if it is very successful, it is good to reserve a server for subscribers !!!!!
Prioritize PRO subscribers to play free to play games and with that until you get more subscribers
You need to know many Stadia games are more expensive for non-Pro members than for Pro members. Pro members have already had discounts when they buy games, and also have a free Pro game library. Pro members also have better resolution and fps for some games. The 5.1 surround sound is also more immersive. Those are where a $9.9 per month subscription fee is spent.
If Stadia follows your suggestion, more non-Pro members will switch to Amazon Luna. Amazon Luna only has the subscription billing method (fee is same as Stadia Pro) but doesn't require users to buy games. So what makes you come up with such a suggestion to ask all Stadia members to pay for the Pro-subscription fee but also buy games on the platform in order to use the Stadia platform? A lot of players do not want any subscription even if they might pay a little more for games they really want to play.
Your suggestion can only destroy Stadia completely.
My Pro subscription is still active. But even though I subscribe to Pro, I am still against your suggestion.
you misunderstood my suggestion, when I mentioned putting a usage limit, it wasn't for purchased games, but for free to play games (which don't need a subscription or purchase, which is the case with Destiny 2, Pubg, among others , these games are totally free to play on Stadia , if the number of users grows I do not know if the platform supports a large number of users without paying anything