I wait for Samsung Game Cloud and i can play on my Samsung QN90A with Tizen.
Did you think Samsung only use stadia and make own deal? I hope Samsung do somthing new and not use same as Google.
I hope Samsung make better dels and works amazing on Samsung QN90A
dreams not dude! Tizen is very bad
Consider this speculation, but from a computer engineer with three decades in the industry. First, let's briefly consider the technical considerations. Recent versions of Tizen include a Chromium-based web component. There are some low-level things that may or may not be there, but having Chromium there at least puts Tizen in striking distance of supporting Stadia (comparable to LG's platform, but in marked contrast to something like Roku, for example).
So, beyond that, there are business considerations. Building a new game-streaming solution is somewhere between "straightforward" and "extremely challenging" depending on how much performance and cost optimization is required. Amazon's Luna, for example, just uses standard GPU-equipped virtual machines on AWS running Windows. It has not been highly optimized for either performance or cost. Stadia is at the other end of the spectrum, with custom video encoding silicon that has been tightly integrated with a protocol stack to achieve minimal latency and optimized loss recovery. So, the question is, would Samsung really invest in building something even relatively unoptimized like Luna if the only use-case is playing from their TVs? I find that unlikely. Maybe if they are also planning to support playing from their Android phones? But, even then, getting into this business with substantial engineering investment is going to need a substantial revenue expectation. It's not impossible, and Samsung has the engineering talent to do it – I just find it hard to bet on.
So, a more likely option would be partnering with someone else who already has a game-streaming solution. Of those, Stadia appears to be the only one offering a white-label option. I would be surprised to see them partner with Amazon, Microsoft, or Luna unless those companies have a white-label option they haven't announced. To further support this, Samsung and Google have a history of working together on Android, and have recently strengthened their partnership on Wear OS. Those relationships are with other parts of Google, of course, but at least it's an indication that senior management in both companies are comfortable working with each other.
As I said, this is all (informed) speculation, though. I will be interested to see how this plays out. But, personally, I am not a fan of "smart" TV features. I prefer to use external devices (I have an Apple TV for streaming video, and use a Chromecast Ultra for Stadia gaming), since built-in features become obsolete much sooner than the display panel itself.
All this you explain about Stadia technology is amazing and like other Stream platforms they are at a lower level.
What the user now needs is the perception that he is using all that technology and silicon and not having the feeling of playing on a PS3, we need something like WOW that looks and works incredible, the stream and multiple screens is no longer news , we need technological advances it is normal that each news in the industry makes users passionate about thinking that another service will be better than Stadia.
Samsung, Netflix.
Even Sega just announced a collaboration with Microsoft for Stream on Azure.
They understand all the number of options that are going to exist here is the feeling that STADIA lost the year focusing on AT&T and turning its back on us.